tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13095695.post112112120066914233..comments2023-10-22T17:40:51.323-04:00Comments on Tativille: Television is not an artMichael J. Andersonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12333893240336518881noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13095695.post-73125941831245749232008-10-23T20:01:00.000-04:002008-10-23T20:01:00.000-04:00I researched this for an assignment on whether 'tv...I researched this for an assignment on whether 'tv is art', and watched clint eastwood, and others mentioned in this blog and believe this blog to be correct, so much so I referenced you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13095695.post-57370691690270405162007-10-20T11:19:00.000-04:002007-10-20T11:19:00.000-04:00I wouldn't disagree. I might add that "Deadwood" ...I wouldn't disagree. I might add that "Deadwood" improves open "McCabe & Mrs. Miller." The question remains whether either is fundamentally - ontologically - different than cinema. My inclination then, as now, is that each medium shares a foundational, aesthetic nature (especially when one is discussing commercially-free, taped-delayed programming).Michael J. Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12333893240336518881noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13095695.post-74040031287795545902007-10-20T09:07:00.000-04:002007-10-20T09:07:00.000-04:00I would agree with Clive James when he wrote in on...I would agree with Clive James when he wrote in one of his essays that The Sopranos is richer and more inventive than the Godfather films.<BR/><BR/>PeterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com